http://www.zeromq.org/docs:contributing
cr On Nov 13, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Justin Karneges <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not make it allowed in a future version? It doesn't seem any more unusual > than other mixings. > > On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 12:32:33 PM Chuck Remes wrote: >> No, do not do this. If it works at all right now, it will break in a future >> library release when the wire protocol enforces peer socket type checking. >> ROUTER -> ROUTER is fine as is ROUTER -> DEALER. >> >> Alternately, do PUB -> SUB. As of libzmq 3.2, the publisher filters out the >> outgoing messages so only those SUBs that have subscribed to the message >> will receive it. This will require you to add a subscription string as the >> first message part for all outgoing messages so the socket can filter it. >> >> Please read the guide if this doesn't make sense to you yet. There are lots >> of great examples with code. >> >> cr >> >> On Nov 13, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Justin Karneges <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Inspired by the PUSH/ROUTER question a moment ago, I wonder if it ought to >>> be possible to match ROUTER and PULL, for one-way directed communication? >>> >>> Currently I am using ROUTER->ROUTER for this, and the receiver just >>> ignores >>> the envelope. Being able to make the receiver PULL seems like it would be >>> more natural. >>> >>> Justin >>> _______________________________________________ >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
