Hi Min, Steven Is there any plan for such a patch? Should I propose one? Or asking first for a feature request?
Thank you! Sabri. Le 10 janv. 2013 15:22, "Min" <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi, > > For JZMQ, the option is not supported yet. > We need a patch for the option. > > Thanks > Min > > 2013년 1월 10일 목요일에 Steven McCoy님이 작성: > >> On 10 January 2013 04:25, Sabri Skhiri <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> We need to support an IPV6 environment and we currently use JZMQ. By >>> googling IPV6 Support and ZMQ I found the Steven McCoy's patch reference ( >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2011-August/012834.html). >>> >>> Basically it says that we just need to setup a socket option to false (* >>> ZMQ_IPV4ONLY)*. >>> >> >> Correct, the only thing missing which is something I recently discovered >> is called "Happy Eyeballs" - RFC6555. >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6555.txt >> >> I found this on a libcurl blog and as they haven't implemented it either: >> it's a set of requirements for dual-stack environments to manage situations >> when IPv6 connectivity fails and IPv4 is possible but with minimal delay >> presented to the user. I'm not aware of an actual algorithm that does >> implement the requirements though. >> >> By that description it may not to be too useful for ZeroMQ either. >> >> -- >> Steve-o >> > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
