I think I could handle it from the other next week. Thanks Min
2013년 1월 11일 금요일에 Sabri Skhiri님이 작성: > Hi Min, Steven > > Is there any plan for such a patch? Should I propose one? Or asking first > for a feature request? > > Thank you! > > Sabri. > Le 10 janv. 2013 15:22, "Min" <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, > 'cvml', '[email protected]');>> a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> For JZMQ, the option is not supported yet. >> We need a patch for the option. >> >> Thanks >> Min >> >> 2013년 1월 10일 목요일에 Steven McCoy님이 작성: >> >>> On 10 January 2013 04:25, Sabri Skhiri <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> We need to support an IPV6 environment and we currently use JZMQ. By >>>> googling IPV6 Support and ZMQ I found the Steven McCoy's patch reference ( >>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2011-August/012834.html). >>>> >>>> Basically it says that we just need to setup a socket option to false ( >>>> *ZMQ_IPV4ONLY)*. >>>> >>> >>> Correct, the only thing missing which is something I recently discovered >>> is called "Happy Eyeballs" - RFC6555. >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6555.txt >>> >>> I found this on a libcurl blog and as they haven't implemented it >>> either: it's a set of requirements for dual-stack environments to manage >>> situations when IPv6 connectivity fails and IPv4 is possible but with >>> minimal delay presented to the user. I'm not aware of an actual algorithm >>> that does implement the requirements though. >>> >>> By that description it may not to be too useful for ZeroMQ either. >>> >>> -- >>> Steve-o >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', >> '[email protected]');> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >>
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
