I've submitted a pull request on it. https://github.com/zeromq/jzmq/pull/150
Thanks Min 2013년 1월 12일 토요일에 Min님이 작성: > I think I could handle it from the other next week. > > Thanks > Min > > 2013년 1월 11일 금요일에 Sabri Skhiri님이 작성: > >> Hi Min, Steven >> >> Is there any plan for such a patch? Should I propose one? Or asking first >> for a feature request? >> >> Thank you! >> >> Sabri. >> Le 10 janv. 2013 15:22, "Min" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> For JZMQ, the option is not supported yet. >>> We need a patch for the option. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Min >>> >>> 2013년 1월 10일 목요일에 Steven McCoy님이 작성: >>> >>>> On 10 January 2013 04:25, Sabri Skhiri <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We need to support an IPV6 environment and we currently use JZMQ. By >>>>> googling IPV6 Support and ZMQ I found the Steven McCoy's patch reference ( >>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2011-August/012834.html >>>>> ). >>>>> >>>>> Basically it says that we just need to setup a socket option to false ( >>>>> *ZMQ_IPV4ONLY)*. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Correct, the only thing missing which is something I recently >>>> discovered is called "Happy Eyeballs" - RFC6555. >>>> >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6555.txt >>>> >>>> I found this on a libcurl blog and as they haven't implemented it >>>> either: it's a set of requirements for dual-stack environments to manage >>>> situations when IPv6 connectivity fails and IPv4 is possible but with >>>> minimal delay presented to the user. I'm not aware of an actual algorithm >>>> that does implement the requirements though. >>>> >>>> By that description it may not to be too useful for ZeroMQ either. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Steve-o >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>> >>>
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
