Oh, I have something to merge in to allow the newest version to work well together, let me do a merge request before you execute this please.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds good to me. It never developed as a separate project, did it. > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Arnaud Kapp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've stumbled upon this issue https://github.com/zeromq/cppzmq/issues/48 > . > > Basically the cppzmq binding (header only, 1 file) is not versioned > > and not packaged on some distros. > > > > People wants this file to be tagged to ease versionning, which make > sense. > > However, wouldn't it be even better if this was part of libzmq. I > > *believe* this was the case a long time ago, but the choice was made > > to split them. > > > > I don't know the reason, but maybe it's worth considering merging them > > back. After all, zmq.hpp is a very thin wrapper and I don't think it'd > > be too annoying to maintain as part of libzmq. > > > > What are your thoughts on this? > > > > -- > > Kapp Arnaud - Xaqq > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
