Hello, Kenneth, is your patch ready? Also, do you mean that the current cppzmq head doesn't work correctly with current libzmq head ? (as in we shouldn't merge now).
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Kenneth Adam Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, I have something to merge in to allow the newest version to work well > together, let me do a merge request before you execute this please. > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Sounds good to me. It never developed as a separate project, did it. >> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Arnaud Kapp <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I've stumbled upon this issue https://github.com/zeromq/cppzmq/issues/48 >> > . >> > Basically the cppzmq binding (header only, 1 file) is not versioned >> > and not packaged on some distros. >> > >> > People wants this file to be tagged to ease versionning, which make >> > sense. >> > However, wouldn't it be even better if this was part of libzmq. I >> > *believe* this was the case a long time ago, but the choice was made >> > to split them. >> > >> > I don't know the reason, but maybe it's worth considering merging them >> > back. After all, zmq.hpp is a very thin wrapper and I don't think it'd >> > be too annoying to maintain as part of libzmq. >> > >> > What are your thoughts on this? >> > >> > -- >> > Kapp Arnaud - Xaqq >> > _______________________________________________ >> > zeromq-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > -- Kapp Arnaud - Xaqq _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
