Actually, after having done some searching, it turns out that the ocaml-zmq binding had fallen behind, which relies off of cppzmq (oddly enough, ocaml bindings only go to C via ctypes, not C++... :/)
In any case, I'm sorry I tied things up, I have been working on this mad sprint for pushing software today, and I'm even still working on that. I have edits to like 4-7 open source projects sitting around with my trying to get everything pristine before shipping. Sorry! I'm shipping ocaml-zmq changes at this moment. On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Kenneth Adam Miller < [email protected]> wrote: > Crap, I'm really sorry! Let me ship that right now. I was thinking about > this not too long ago and wondering where my commit went, because I know I > made edits... > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Arnaud Kapp <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Kenneth, is your patch ready? >> Also, do you mean that the current cppzmq head doesn't work correctly >> with current libzmq head ? (as in we shouldn't merge now). >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Kenneth Adam Miller >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Oh, I have something to merge in to allow the newest version to work >> well >> > together, let me do a merge request before you execute this please. >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Sounds good to me. It never developed as a separate project, did it. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Arnaud Kapp <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> >> > >> >> > I've stumbled upon this issue >> https://github.com/zeromq/cppzmq/issues/48 >> >> > . >> >> > Basically the cppzmq binding (header only, 1 file) is not versioned >> >> > and not packaged on some distros. >> >> > >> >> > People wants this file to be tagged to ease versionning, which make >> >> > sense. >> >> > However, wouldn't it be even better if this was part of libzmq. I >> >> > *believe* this was the case a long time ago, but the choice was made >> >> > to split them. >> >> > >> >> > I don't know the reason, but maybe it's worth considering merging >> them >> >> > back. After all, zmq.hpp is a very thin wrapper and I don't think >> it'd >> >> > be too annoying to maintain as part of libzmq. >> >> > >> >> > What are your thoughts on this? >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Kapp Arnaud - Xaqq >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > zeromq-dev mailing list >> >> > [email protected] >> >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > zeromq-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Kapp Arnaud - Xaqq >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
