I've updated the trademark policy since it was slightly out of date. http://zeromq.org/docs:trademark-policy
The goal of this policy is to ensure that users know what they're getting. In your case I'd use -zmtp in the name, or call it something else. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Axel Voitier <axel.voit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Pieter, > > Neat! :) > > Yes, it would be nice if it spawns interest for other embedded targets. > I am all for the C4.1 policy, and for the move to the zeromq organization. > Thanks for proposing! > > Could you enlighten me about what can be named zeromq actually? Is it the > full set of ZMTP+all sockets behaviour, or is it just limited to libzmq and > its bindings? > I guess the name of the project can then be changed to contiki-zmtp (or > contiki-libzmtp?) when moving to the organisation. > > > Cheers, > Axel > > -- > Contact: axel.voit...@gmail.com > Secure: axel.voit...@protonmail.ch > > 2016-01-20 12:47 GMT+01:00 Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com>: >> >> Oh, and I sent you your first pull request. :) >> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: >> > Hi Axel, >> > >> > This is really cool... could be the basis for other embedded projects. >> > I'd like to move this into the zeromq organization and use our C4.1 >> > contribution policy, is that OK? >> > >> > The name suggests you ported libzmq, which is misleading. It'd be >> > better to say "ZMTP" instead of "ZeroMQ". >> > >> > I've invited you to the ZeroMQ core team so you can move this project >> > (if you approve of this idea). >> > >> > -Pieter >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Axel Voitier <axel.voit...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> Yes, I actually started from libzmtp. Few things remain from it now >> >> (channels and msgs) as I had to adapt it to whatever Contiki provides. >> >> Contiki does not have a posix socket interface. But the hardest was t >> >> adapt >> >> to its threading model (protothreads) which were really constraining... >> >> >> >> Also, I adapted the memory allocations to do use as much as possible >> >> preallocation (called memb in Contiki). A few malloc remains here and >> >> there, >> >> but much less than initially. >> >> >> >> >> >> However, if I was to restart this project, I would not pick Contiki >> >> anymore. >> >> But rather give it a try with RIOT, which seems to have something that >> >> match >> >> a POSIX interface. And a much saner threading model that behaves a bit >> >> like >> >> an event loop with a hub (and reusing features from the underlying MCU >> >> to do >> >> context switching, like the SVC instruction with ARM). >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Axel >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Contact: axel.voit...@gmail.com >> >> Secure: axel.voit...@protonmail.ch >> >> >> >> 2016-01-20 9:31 GMT+01:00 Benjamin Henrion <zoo...@gmail.com>: >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Axel Voitier <axel.voit...@gmail.com> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > Hello, >> >>> > >> >>> > I have published an attempt at porting zeromq to Contiki OS: >> >>> > https://github.com/Alidron/contiki-zeromq >> >>> > >> >>> > It has a few limitations still. However, I covered most basics of >> >>> > ZMTP >> >>> > and a >> >>> > handful of sockets. It is not entirely compliant with the RFCs for >> >>> > the >> >>> > moment though (some parts prove to be harder to do than I expected). >> >>> > >> >>> > I have been able to run it on a constrained setup: ARM Cortext M3 >> >>> > running at >> >>> > 32MHz, with 512KB of flash (the demo programs weight about 130KB) >> >>> > and >> >>> > 80KB >> >>> > of RAM. And with a sub-1GHz RF link. >> >>> > >> >>> > The implementation makes use of Contiki network stack, which can use >> >>> > TCP, >> >>> > IPv4, IPv6 and 6LoWPAN. I actually tested it over 6LoWPAN on the >> >>> > sub-GHz >> >>> > link :). >> >>> > >> >>> > It is not has featured and fast as running zeromq between two usual >> >>> > computers. But I hope this implementation prove it is feasible to >> >>> > have >> >>> > ZeroMQ on such constrained hardware :). >> >>> >> >>> Have you tried to compile libzmtp? >> >>> >> >>> One of my short-term goal is to make libzmptp running on esp8266 and >> >>> some cortex m3 board. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org> >> >>> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 >> >>> "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software >> >>> patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. >> >>> Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of >> >>> software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent >> >>> court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their >> >>> favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or >> >>> democratically elected legislators." >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >> >>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
