Try to create the repo now, it should work. Indeed, zmq.c/h is probably a bad filename to use and zmtp.c/h is better. However I'd probably advise putting the sources into src and prefixing them all with something like cz_
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Axel Voitier <axel.voit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Got it. > > It seems I don't have sufficient rights to create a repo in the > organisation. > Please, could you either add me the right, or create a repo named > "contiki-zmtp"? > > By the way, there are zmq.c/h files in the current implementation in which I > have put things built on top of the ZMTP implementation (typically socket > related stuff, module initialisation). > Should I merge what it contains to zmtp.c/h (for instance), or find another > name for it? > > > Cheers, > Axel > > -- > Contact: axel.voit...@gmail.com > Secure: axel.voit...@protonmail.ch > > 2016-01-20 16:47 GMT+01:00 Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com>: >> >> I've updated the trademark policy since it was slightly out of date. >> >> http://zeromq.org/docs:trademark-policy >> >> The goal of this policy is to ensure that users know what they're >> getting. In your case I'd use -zmtp in the name, or call it something >> else. >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Axel Voitier <axel.voit...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi Pieter, >> > >> > Neat! :) >> > >> > Yes, it would be nice if it spawns interest for other embedded targets. >> > I am all for the C4.1 policy, and for the move to the zeromq >> > organization. >> > Thanks for proposing! >> > >> > Could you enlighten me about what can be named zeromq actually? Is it >> > the >> > full set of ZMTP+all sockets behaviour, or is it just limited to libzmq >> > and >> > its bindings? >> > I guess the name of the project can then be changed to contiki-zmtp (or >> > contiki-libzmtp?) when moving to the organisation. >> > >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Axel >> > >> > -- >> > Contact: axel.voit...@gmail.com >> > Secure: axel.voit...@protonmail.ch >> > >> > 2016-01-20 12:47 GMT+01:00 Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com>: >> >> >> >> Oh, and I sent you your first pull request. :) >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Axel, >> >> > >> >> > This is really cool... could be the basis for other embedded >> >> > projects. >> >> > I'd like to move this into the zeromq organization and use our C4.1 >> >> > contribution policy, is that OK? >> >> > >> >> > The name suggests you ported libzmq, which is misleading. It'd be >> >> > better to say "ZMTP" instead of "ZeroMQ". >> >> > >> >> > I've invited you to the ZeroMQ core team so you can move this project >> >> > (if you approve of this idea). >> >> > >> >> > -Pieter >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Axel Voitier >> >> > <axel.voit...@gmail.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> Yes, I actually started from libzmtp. Few things remain from it now >> >> >> (channels and msgs) as I had to adapt it to whatever Contiki >> >> >> provides. >> >> >> Contiki does not have a posix socket interface. But the hardest was >> >> >> t >> >> >> adapt >> >> >> to its threading model (protothreads) which were really >> >> >> constraining... >> >> >> >> >> >> Also, I adapted the memory allocations to do use as much as possible >> >> >> preallocation (called memb in Contiki). A few malloc remains here >> >> >> and >> >> >> there, >> >> >> but much less than initially. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> However, if I was to restart this project, I would not pick Contiki >> >> >> anymore. >> >> >> But rather give it a try with RIOT, which seems to have something >> >> >> that >> >> >> match >> >> >> a POSIX interface. And a much saner threading model that behaves a >> >> >> bit >> >> >> like >> >> >> an event loop with a hub (and reusing features from the underlying >> >> >> MCU >> >> >> to do >> >> >> context switching, like the SVC instruction with ARM). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> Axel >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Contact: axel.voit...@gmail.com >> >> >> Secure: axel.voit...@protonmail.ch >> >> >> >> >> >> 2016-01-20 9:31 GMT+01:00 Benjamin Henrion <zoo...@gmail.com>: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Axel Voitier >> >> >>> <axel.voit...@gmail.com> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> > Hello, >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > I have published an attempt at porting zeromq to Contiki OS: >> >> >>> > https://github.com/Alidron/contiki-zeromq >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > It has a few limitations still. However, I covered most basics of >> >> >>> > ZMTP >> >> >>> > and a >> >> >>> > handful of sockets. It is not entirely compliant with the RFCs >> >> >>> > for >> >> >>> > the >> >> >>> > moment though (some parts prove to be harder to do than I >> >> >>> > expected). >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > I have been able to run it on a constrained setup: ARM Cortext M3 >> >> >>> > running at >> >> >>> > 32MHz, with 512KB of flash (the demo programs weight about 130KB) >> >> >>> > and >> >> >>> > 80KB >> >> >>> > of RAM. And with a sub-1GHz RF link. >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > The implementation makes use of Contiki network stack, which can >> >> >>> > use >> >> >>> > TCP, >> >> >>> > IPv4, IPv6 and 6LoWPAN. I actually tested it over 6LoWPAN on the >> >> >>> > sub-GHz >> >> >>> > link :). >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > It is not has featured and fast as running zeromq between two >> >> >>> > usual >> >> >>> > computers. But I hope this implementation prove it is feasible to >> >> >>> > have >> >> >>> > ZeroMQ on such constrained hardware :). >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Have you tried to compile libzmtp? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> One of my short-term goal is to make libzmptp running on esp8266 >> >> >>> and >> >> >>> some cortex m3 board. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> -- >> >> >>> Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org> >> >> >>> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 >> >> >>> "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software >> >> >>> patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. >> >> >>> Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of >> >> >>> software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent >> >> >>> court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in >> >> >>> their >> >> >>> favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or >> >> >>> democratically elected legislators." >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >> >> >>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> >> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> >> >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> >> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > zeromq-dev mailing list >> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
