I'm in favor of Google groups, relative to the alternatives. On Thursday, April 14, 2016, Greg Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> Google groups is a mediocre solution given all the alternatives but > its also quite commonly used so most people are willing to deal with > its warts. The history of the group would be important to bring over > if possible (I do not know of an api for bringing it over). > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to raise this question for discussion. The problem is that > > zeromq-dev is running on an iMatix server, and I'd like to remove > > iMatix infrastructure from our community, over time. It's a matter of > > long term sustainability. > > > > (Apart from the list, iMatix also hosts downloads.zeromq.org which we > > can start to move to Github release attachments IMO.) > > > > Anyhow, re. lists, let's weigh pros and cons of Google groups versus > > other options. I'll make the decision based on this thread and other > > factors. > > > > Thanks > > Pieter > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > -- > Studying for the Turing test > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > -- Kyle Kelley (@rgbkrk <https://twitter.com/rgbkrk>; lambdaops.com)
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
