Yes, retiring the deprecated APIs and bumping the major version should go together. On 24 Apr 2016 13:37, "Luca Boccassi" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-04-24 at 00:09 +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > > we can mark individual methods and classes as draft, even within a > > stable release. > > > > On 23 Apr 2016 21:10, "Brian Knox" <[email protected]> wrote: > > When we cut another "stable" release of CZMQ to keep packagers > > happy, I'm wondering what version we'll use - specifically > > around a stable release that include radar/dish, > > scatter/gather and client/server. > > > > > > I want to start a new version of the rsyslog input and output > > plugins that only support the new thread safe sockets. To > > avoid ifdef hell in the current plugins I'll probably just > > make new instances - so if the next release is 4, I'll name > > them omczmq4 / imczmq4 etc. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Brian > > Hi, > > <puts nosy Debian Maintainer hat on> > > Given since the last release some public APIs have changed in an > incompatible way (eg: zmsg_encode/decode signatures), there should be a > major version bump (besides an ABI bump), and I'll have to upload a new > source/-dev package. > > A while ago we also talked about the possibility of retiring the > deprecated APIs. Is that still on the plate? > > Kind regards, > Luca Boccassi > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
