> On 10/22/08 13:56, Marcelo Leal wrote: > >>> But the slog is the ZIL. formaly a *separate* > >> intent log. > >> > >> No the slog is not the ZIL! > > Ok, when you did write this: > > "I've been slogging for a while on support for > separate intent logs (slogs) for ZFS. > > Without slogs, the ZIL is allocated dynamically > from the main pool". > > > > You were talking about "The body of code " in the > statement: "the ZIL is allocated "? > > So i have misunderstood you... > > > > Leal. > > I guess I need to fix that!
See? I think you are being a little dramatic... Ok, there is the ZIL (code), and the "ZFS intent log". It's just inevitable that people will call the "ZFS intent log.. ZIL for short". But i respect you! You write the code... ;-) Let's go back to the point. Leal > Anyway the slog is not the ZIL it's one of the two > currently possible Intent Log types. > > Sorry for the confusion: Neil. > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discu > ss -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
