On Mar 31, 2010, at 7:57 PM, Charles Hedrick wrote: > So that eliminates one of my concerns. However the other one is still an > issue. Presumably Solaris Cluster shouldn't import a pool that's still active > on the other system. We'll be looking more carefully into that.
Older releases of Solaris Cluster used SCSI reservations to help prevent such things. However, that is now tunable :-( Did you tune it? -- richard ZFS storage and performance consulting at http://www.RichardElling.com ZFS training on deduplication, NexentaStor, and NAS performance Las Vegas, April 29-30, 2010 http://nexenta-vegas.eventbrite.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
