On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Richard Elling <richard.ell...@richardelling.com> wrote: > Apologies to the ZFSers, this thread really belongs elsewhere.
Some of the info in it is informative for other zfs users as well though :) > Here is the output, I changed to "tick-5sec" and "trunc(@, 5)". > > No.2 and No.3 is what I care about. > The sort is in reverse order. The large number you see below the > stack trace is the number of times that stack was seen. By far the > most frequently seen is tmpfs`tmp_readdir So to summarize, even though there are locks in zfs, they are normal, and insignificant performance-wise (at least in this case). And if performance is a problem, the cause is elsewhere. Is that correct? -- Fajar _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss