On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 08:48:54AM -0400, Hung-Sheng Tsao Ph.D. wrote: > hi > if U have not check this page please do > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS > interesting info about the status of ZFS in various OS > regards
Thanks for the pointer. It doesn't answer my question though -- where the most development momentum is. It does seem that Illumian is a Debian-flavored distro of OpenIndiana, so I wonder why the napp-it author puts OpenIndiana first in his list. It would be interesting to see when zpool versions >28 will be available in the open forks. Particularly encryption is a very useful functionality. > my 2c > 1)if you have the money buy ZFS appliance I would certainly not give any money to Oracle. > 2)if you want to build your self napp-it get solaris 11 support, it only Oracle Solaris is dead to me for pretty much the same reasons. > charge the SW/socket and not change by storage capacity > Nexenta Enterprise platform charge U $$ for raw capacity I'm currently using NexentaCore which is EOL. It seems my choices are either OpenIndiana or Illumian, which seem to be very closely related. > On 7/11/2012 7:51 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: >> As a napp-it user who recently needs to upgrade from NexentaCore I recently >> saw >> "preferred for OpenIndiana live but running under Illumian, NexentaCore and >> Solaris 11 (Express)" >> as a system recommendation for napp-it. >> >> I wonder about the future of OpenIndiana and Illumian, which >> fork is likely to see the most continued development, in your opinion? >> >> Thanks. >> _______________________________________________ >> zfs-discuss mailing list >> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss