No, I got that. I think I properly addressed that. I just would like him
to add something to the discussion in the form of a rationale for his
statement, rather than just repeatedly making the same unclear statement.
Besides, I was having fun!
John W. Redelfs wrote:
> After much pondering, Jon Spencer favored us with:
> >You must be much more clear than you have been. Again, I ask, what do
> >mean by "moving on." I can make lots of guesses, but you should know
> >what you mean. As an example of your lack of clarity, do you mean that
> >are turning our backs to the Taliban and assuming that they no longer
> >any threat? If that is what you mean, then you are clearly incorrect.
> >perhaps you mean that addressing the Taliban would utilize all of our
> >resources. Again, sadly, you would be incorrect.
> I'll bet I understood him. He meant lets win the first battle before we
> pick an other fight. Maybe he is harder for some people to understand than
> others. --JWR
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
This email was sent to: email@example.com
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!