No, I got that. I think I properly addressed that. I just would like him to add something to the discussion in the form of a rationale for his statement, rather than just repeatedly making the same unclear statement.
Besides, I was having fun! Jon John W. Redelfs wrote: > After much pondering, Jon Spencer favored us with: > >You must be much more clear than you have been. Again, I ask, what do you > >mean by "moving on." I can make lots of guesses, but you should know best > >what you mean. As an example of your lack of clarity, do you mean that we > >are turning our backs to the Taliban and assuming that they no longer pose > >any threat? If that is what you mean, then you are clearly incorrect. Or > >perhaps you mean that addressing the Taliban would utilize all of our > >resources. Again, sadly, you would be incorrect. > > I'll bet I understood him. He meant lets win the first battle before we > pick an other fight. Maybe he is harder for some people to understand than > others. --JWR ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at /// /// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html /// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
