No, I got that.  I think I properly addressed that.  I just would like him
to add something to the discussion in the form of a rationale for his
statement, rather than just repeatedly making the same unclear statement.

Besides, I was having fun!


John W. Redelfs wrote:

> After much pondering, Jon Spencer favored us with:
> >You must be much more clear than you have been.  Again, I ask, what do
> >mean by "moving on."  I can make lots of guesses, but you should know
> >what you mean.  As an example of your lack of clarity, do you mean that
> >are turning our backs to the Taliban and assuming that they no longer
> >any threat?  If that is what you mean, then you are clearly incorrect.
> >perhaps you mean that addressing the Taliban would utilize all of our
> >resources.  Again, sadly, you would be incorrect.
> I'll bet I understood him.  He meant lets win the first battle before we
> pick an other fight. Maybe he is harder for some people to understand than
> others. --JWR

///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///      ///

This email was sent to:

Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!

Reply via email to