You must be much more clear than you have been. Again, I ask, what do you mean by "moving on." I can make lots of guesses, but you should know best what you mean. As an example of your lack of clarity, do you mean that we are turning our backs to the Taliban and assuming that they no longer pose any threat? If that is what you mean, then you are clearly incorrect. Or perhaps you mean that addressing the Taliban would utilize all of our resources. Again, sadly, you would be incorrect. Or perhaps you mean that al Qaeda and the Taliban are one, and that it was the Taliban who killed our people, and not al Qaeda. Yet again, you would be wrong.
And since I must assume that you are positing a carefully thought our opinion, I must assume that I do not understand what you are saying or implying. Jon Stacy Smith wrote: > We are moving to other targets as if we have the Taliban licked. We don't. > > Stacy. > > At 07:30 AM 11/07/2002 -0500, you wrote: > > >OK, I'll bite. What should we do? And why do you think we are "moving on" > >(could you define that please?)? > > > >Jon > > > >Stacy Smith wrote: > > > >My point still holds even if they are no longer in Afghanistan. Why are we > >moving on? ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at /// /// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html /// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: archive@jab.org EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
