You must be much more clear than you have been.  Again, I ask, what do you
mean by "moving on."  I can make lots of guesses, but you should know best
what you mean.  As an example of your lack of clarity, do you mean that we
are turning our backs to the Taliban and assuming that they no longer pose
any threat?  If that is what you mean, then you are clearly incorrect.  Or
perhaps you mean that addressing the Taliban would utilize all of our
resources.  Again, sadly, you would be incorrect.  Or perhaps you mean that
al Qaeda and the Taliban are one, and that it was the Taliban who killed our
people, and not al Qaeda.  Yet again, you would be wrong.

And since I must assume that you are positing a carefully thought our
opinion, I must assume that I do not understand what you are saying or


Stacy Smith wrote:

> We are moving to other targets as if we have the Taliban licked.  We
> Stacy.
> At 07:30 AM 11/07/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >OK, I'll bite.  What should we do?  And why do you think we are "moving
> >(could you define that please?)?
> >
> >Jon
> >
> >Stacy Smith wrote:
> >
> >My point still holds even if they are no longer in Afghanistan.  Why are
> >moving on?

///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///      ///

This email was sent to:

Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!

Reply via email to