-Marc- > [Previously] One party domination is in direct defiance of the > Brethren. > [Now] Also, you've missed a quite legitimate parsing of my > sentence. When one says x is in defiance of y, that implies > that "belief in x" is in defiance of y.
Okay, that's reasonable. I don't agree with it, but it's much different from (and more inoffensive than) the meaning I originally inferred from your words. Stephen ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at /// /// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html /// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: archive@jab.org EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
