> [Previously] One party domination is in direct defiance of the
> [Now] Also, you've missed a quite legitimate parsing of my
> sentence. When one says x is in defiance of y, that implies
> that "belief in x" is in defiance of y.
Okay, that's reasonable. I don't agree with it, but it's much different
from (and more inoffensive than) the meaning I originally inferred from
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
This email was sent to: email@example.com
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!