> A customer is not in any way responsible for what one of its
> subcontractors say unless it is in the context of both of them
> acting together.

So then, why do you bother including the disclaimer at the end of each 
of your posts?

> And please read properly: it was the *Alberta* government in
> the MediaWorks situation, not the *Canadian* government.

Good point, duly noted.

> If you can't even get that right, it's no surprise that you
> get everything else wrong, too.

Thanks for the kind words.

> Jim was wrong, as I've demonstrated on several ocasions. I
> don't care about his dictionary definition. Ducros is no Ari
> Fleischer.

So then, the dictionary is only correct if it agrees with your personal 

> Your ignorance just makes you look silly.

How true this is. Thanks again for more kind words.


///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html      ///

This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!

Reply via email to