Jim Cobabe wrote:
> NOMA is a contemptuous science insider's joke--a condescending pat on
> the head for the idiot child.
NOMA is also very similar to what the 1P said in 1931 in the last official
statement on the origin of man: leave science to the scientists and religion to
the Brethren. So be careful of criticizing it just because it was written by an
> John Pratt is an easy target for the irreverent skeptics. His
> credentials are weak. He tends to wander off into explorations of the
> wierd and wonderful instead of submitting serious papers to refereed
> science journals. So, anyone serious about "true science" can dismiss
> him and anything he says with the usual patronizing wink and nod.
Why would criticism of someone for going into the weird and wonderful on the basis
of being scientific be considered "irreverent"?
> It's all simply figurative anyway. ;-)
> Mij Ebaboc
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
“Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick
himself up and continue on” – Winston Churchill
Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
This email was sent to: email@example.com
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!