George Cobabe favored us with:
The problem is that the doctrine of the trinity is so convoluted we cannot
if discuss it without being subject to the same requirements of confusion
and misunderstanding.

Not much simpler is it?
I think I got it the second time around. Still, conceptually it is a little above my head, like something that Dennis Potter might write. For me it is enough to know that the doctrine of the Holy Trinity, which is nonsense, is just a corrupted form of the doctrine we believe in that there is a Godhead comprised of an individual Father, an individual Son, and an individual Holy Ghost. I believe that the doctrine of reincarnation which is believed in many of the eastern religions is just an apostate version of the true doctrine of resurrection.

" proving contraries, truth is made manifest" --Joseph
Smith, History of the Church, Volume 6, p.248
All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR

/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// ///

This email was sent to:

Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!

Reply via email to