Tim Peters wrote: > Jim Fulton] >>We should probably think harder about the semantics of sync. But it >>implied a transaction boundary -- specifically, an abort. You wouldn't >>want this to happen automatically. > > > I assume Rajeev doesn't really want to call sync() automatically, because > that's never what anyone asking that question really wants. What they > invariably _want_ is for ZEO to process invalidations by magic, and they've > been calling sync() manually as a way to get that to happen.
Would it be sensible for ZODB to do the equivalent of sync() when users call transaction.begin()? That's what I tend to expect it to do anyway--it takes some effort to remember that it doesn't. Shane _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
