Tim Peters wrote:
ISynchronizer should grow a new method:
"""Hook that is called at the start of a transaction."""
The TM calls this method with the new transaction.
I like this, although I don't know what "start of a transaction" means.
It means that the application has called "begin" on the transaction manager.
It has signalled that any work it does after the begin call should be in
this new transaction. The application has set a transaction boundary.
A fourth possible meaning is that newTransaction should be invoked after a
commit() or abort() too, since in some sense we (at least conceptually) "are
in a new transaction" the instant after the current transaction ends.
Yes, this is an implicit new transaction, however, I don't think a call
is necessary. Synchronizers should know that a completion is equivalent
to an implicit begin.
What's your true intent here?
See my definition above.
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org