Sidnei da Silva wrote at 2005-9-1 17:13 -0300:
>Yes, he's the one in charge of registering the subscribers so they are
>called in the order he wants them to.
> event(IBeforeSubsystem, SubSystem)
> execute SubSystem
> event(IAfterSubsystem, Subsystem)
>Back to my example, 'B' would subscribe to 'event(IAfterSubsystem,
>A)', and 'AB' could subscribe to 'event(IBeforeSubsystem, B)'.
You mean the integrator would subscribe "B" to "event(after, A)"
and "AB" to "event(before, B)"?
That is near what I am looking for (the individual systems do not
know about each other -- only the integrator does).
However, I find it more natural to use numbers on a global
scale to coordinate the subsystems than explicit tighing systems
on one another.
If I decide to remove one of the subsystems
used as docking point for a different one, then
the other systems will no longer be activated.
But, probably, this is a matter of preferences.
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org