On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 08:55:28PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote: | Sidnei da Silva wrote at 2005-9-1 17:13 -0300: | > ... | >Yes, he's the one in charge of registering the subscribers so they are | >called in the order he wants them to. | > | >So: | > | > event(IBeforeSubsystem, SubSystem) | > execute SubSystem | > event(IAfterSubsystem, Subsystem) | > | >Back to my example, 'B' would subscribe to 'event(IAfterSubsystem, | >A)', and 'AB' could subscribe to 'event(IBeforeSubsystem, B)'. | | You mean the integrator would subscribe "B" to "event(after, A)" | and "AB" to "event(before, B)"? | | That is near what I am looking for (the individual systems do not | know about each other -- only the integrator does).
Yes. | However, I find it more natural to use numbers on a global | scale to coordinate the subsystems than explicit tighing systems | on one another. Can you give a simple example? -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systems, LLC. http://enfoldsystems.com _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
