El vie, 24-03-2006 a las 10:25 -0300, Sidnei da Silva escribió: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 02:20:06PM +0100, Antonio Beamud Montero wrote: > | > | I think I will remove ZODB from my server and use a SQL Object mapper > | > | like SQLObject to see if I can get an stable server, or the dbapi > | > | directly.. my experience with ZODB and threads has been a nightmare :( > | > | > Don't let yourself be turned down so quickly.
> All languages and all their tools have their 'problems'. If you don't > understand how they work or what they do you will never be able to > write a system that performs well and has good memory management. well, I have read a lot of python internals, but now I haven't any way to solve the memory management without a patch over the interpreter, i.e. something like: zodb.forceGC() to force the garbage collector to free the unused memory... My only hope is to apply the 2.5a1 patch and wait to works... > No language or tool will 'magically' give you that, no matter what > others say *wink*. Yes, but I need something more predictable, not by use a DB (as ZODB) in the correct way, my memory starts to grow without control... finally I think I'll return to C :-) Greetings _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
