Manuel Vazquez Acosta wrote at 2007-2-11 19:29 -0500: > ... >I have read that each thread should have its own connection to the DB. >However, in my case, each thread should be aware of what is actually in >the DB at all times. So I wonder if I can shared the connection between >those threads as long as I take the means to protect it (i.e RLock).
You might be able to do that -- but you would loose almost all benefits of the ZODB: an earlier discussion with Jim and Jeremy indicated that not only writes would need such locking but reads as well.... I think, you should forget about using the same ZODB connection in different threads... -- Dieter _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
