Hi, I was wondering whether it might be reasonabl to let a ConflictError always doom a transaction.
If you look at things like `tal:on-error` then those errors can be accidentally swallowed and still have the transaction commit. If the transaction was doomed then those requests would provide a real error because the transaction couldn't be committed although the publisher tries. Thoughts? (I think this is sort of a more zodbish than zopeish question, so I'm posting it here.) Christian -- gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle (saale) - germany www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 - fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
