I was wondering whether it might be reasonabl to let a ConflictError
always doom a transaction.

If you look at things like `tal:on-error` then those errors can be
accidentally swallowed and still have the transaction commit. If the
transaction was doomed then those requests would provide a real error
because the transaction couldn't be committed although the publisher


(I think this is sort of a more zodbish than zopeish question, so I'm
posting it here.)


gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle (saale) - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Reply via email to