Rob Miller wrote:
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
>> You should also add a test that currently fails, but passes with your 
>> change; that's the best way to ensure it won't break again.  I recognize 
>> that may be fairly difficult, but there are a lot of people here who 
>> will answer questions.
> no problem, this one was easy:

Nice work!


For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -

Reply via email to