On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote:
>>> It was changes like this one
>> I don't understand how the BTree changes would run afoul of this.
>> This code should prevent the BTree from overflowing in the first place, no?
> It should. But it failed to recognize that a Python int on a 64bit
> platform is too large to fit into an IITreeSet. For some reason this
> problem only started showing up after the BTree fixes.
I guess if Nathan can't run 3.8.6 (or 3.9), 3.8.4 should be OK, as the
fix is for a false positive of a problem.
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org