Also, I haven't seen any BTree issues yet. Is there anything that would trigger this? We are running a 64 bit platform.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nathan Van Gheem <vangh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Both releases will work for us I believe. We're currently on 3.8.5 > with a few custom fixes of my own so this release fits perfectly. > > Thank you for your help! > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote: >>>>> It was changes like this one >>>>> http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/src/Products/PluginIndexes/DateIndex/DateIndex.py?rev=115442&r1=115279&r2=115442 >>>> >>>> I don't understand how the BTree changes would run afoul of this. >>>> This code should prevent the BTree from overflowing in the first place, no? >>> >>> It should. But it failed to recognize that a Python int on a 64bit >>> platform is too large to fit into an IITreeSet. For some reason this >>> problem only started showing up after the BTree fixes. >> >> Well, Hmph. >> >> I guess if Nathan can't run 3.8.6 (or 3.9), 3.8.4 should be OK, as the >> fix is for a false positive of a problem. >> >> Jim >> >> -- >> Jim Fulton >> > _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
