Also, I haven't seen any BTree issues yet. Is there anything that
would trigger this? We are running a 64 bit platform.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nathan Van Gheem <vangh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Both releases will work for us I believe. We're currently on 3.8.5
> with a few custom fixes of my own so this release fits perfectly.
> Thank you for your help!
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu>
>>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote:
>>>>> It was changes like this one
>>>> I don't understand how the BTree changes would run afoul of this.
>>>> This code should prevent the BTree from overflowing in the first place, no?
>>> It should. But it failed to recognize that a Python int on a 64bit
>>> platform is too large to fit into an IITreeSet. For some reason this
>>> problem only started showing up after the BTree fixes.
>> Well, Hmph.
>> I guess if Nathan can't run 3.8.6 (or 3.9), 3.8.4 should be OK, as the
>> fix is for a false positive of a problem.
>> Jim Fulton
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org