On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote:
>> It was changes like this one
> I don't understand how the BTree changes would run afoul of this.
> This code should prevent the BTree from overflowing in the first place, no?
It should. But it failed to recognize that a Python int on a 64bit
platform is too large to fit into an IITreeSet. For some reason this
problem only started showing up after the BTree fixes.
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org