I don't know much about Aran's project, so you are right to wonder the
necessity to have yet another storage backend.
Maybe he has needs and requirements that can't be fulfilled by the current
Aran, can you fill us in a little on the necessity of having a DHT ? What are
the requirements you're trying to fulfill for your project ?
On Jan 3, 2011, at 11:06 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Marc Villemade wrote:
>> Hey Andreas,
>> I think it makes sense if the storage backend is hosted on-premise (hence
>> private cloud), and i think that's what Aran is thinking about.
>> They could have Plone->ZODB->Storage backend in the same datacenter, hence
>> no latency problem and good network throughput, provided that the cloud
>> storage used is capable of offering high performance.
> First you should bring up arguments why the existing backends like ZEO,
> Relstorage or NEO are not good enough in your case. Looking at the
> development history of Relstorage or NEO: implementing an
> enterprise-level storage for the ZODB seems to be hard and
> time-consuming (and expensive).
> - -aj
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org