Thank your for your quick answer.
Am 26.10.2011 19:34, schrieb Jim Fulton:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Tamer Higazi <th9...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hey Jim!
>> Hey just cool down.
> /me cools down
>> I love the ZODB database, and this toy is just
>> beautiful. I iam willing to offer myself to support you porting the
>> database in pure python, if you need volunteers.
> Thanks. I'll keep that in mind.
>> I really didn't mean, to come anybody stupid.
> I hope you don't mind me playfully amplifying your !s. :)
>> I am just thinking porting
>> a customer project from python to iron-python where ZODB plays a role.
> If this is a customer project, I'd recommend dropping either
> iron python or ZODB at this stage.
Why that?! As I know, ironpython creates with the JIT compiler bytecode
>> Is there much work to do?!
> Not sure. I suspect not. Tres created a Python implementation of
> persistence and timestamp. I've got a BTrees patch to review.
> Keep in mind that these will run a lot slower than what you're used to.
> If a performance is an issue, you may find yourself wanting to write
> c# versions of these.
what about pypy ?!
For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org