Steve Lawrence wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:37:30PM +0200, Menno Lageman wrote: >> Steve Lawrence wrote: >>> Have you considered also implementing project.max-processes? This would >>> give a zone admin some control over workloads within the zone. I would >>> follow suit and make project 0 in the global zone exempt from its >>> project.max-processes rctl. >> I hadn't considered project.max-processes yet, mainly because what I see >> in the field is that most people seem to consider project rctls to be >> too much detail. Configuring limits at the zone level seems to be the >> preferred option. But it can't hurt to see what it would take to also >> have project.max-processes. > > Besides another rctl_test in cfork, you'll also need to have a test in > tasksys_settaskid(). Very similar to rc_project_nlwps.
Thanks for the pointer to tasksys_settaskid(). My rctl_test() is in getproc() btw, as that seems the most logical place. Menno -- Menno Lageman - Sun Microsystems - http://blogs.sun.com/menno _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list email@example.com