Maybe someone on the install or zones discussion lists can help answer 
this question.


Giovanni Schmid wrote:
> I have read different articles/docs/posts about solaris zones and liveupgrade 
> issues until now; however, I have some doubts about the right way to deploy 
> liveupgrade boot environments in the following case.
> I have a system with two disks configured as "mirrors" (that is, the same 
> fdisk partition and VTOC).
> On the primary disk, I installed Solaris 10 8/07 with two sparse root zones, 
> say Z1 and Z2. Just two file systems were settled on the primary disk: an UFS 
> mounted on /, and a ZFS pool mirroring  slice 4 of the two disks and mounted 
> on /zfspool on the 1st disk. The UFS is intended to contain all but user's 
> homes. These are served through a ZFS, namely /zfspool/users/home. Only zone 
> Z2 inherits this ZFS, via the "add fs" setting.
> All that premised,  my questions are:
> What is the correct way of using Live Upgrade for this case ? Would something 
> like:
>
> # lucreate -c bootenv1 -m /:c2d0s0:ufs -n bootenv2
>
> be sufficient ? That is, will Z2 in bootenv2 "see"  /zfspool/users/home ?
>
> Any help is appreciated !
>
> g.s
>  
>  
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> storage-discuss mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
>   

_______________________________________________
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to