Maybe someone on the install or zones discussion lists can help answer this question.
Giovanni Schmid wrote: > I have read different articles/docs/posts about solaris zones and liveupgrade > issues until now; however, I have some doubts about the right way to deploy > liveupgrade boot environments in the following case. > I have a system with two disks configured as "mirrors" (that is, the same > fdisk partition and VTOC). > On the primary disk, I installed Solaris 10 8/07 with two sparse root zones, > say Z1 and Z2. Just two file systems were settled on the primary disk: an UFS > mounted on /, and a ZFS pool mirroring slice 4 of the two disks and mounted > on /zfspool on the 1st disk. The UFS is intended to contain all but user's > homes. These are served through a ZFS, namely /zfspool/users/home. Only zone > Z2 inherits this ZFS, via the "add fs" setting. > All that premised, my questions are: > What is the correct way of using Live Upgrade for this case ? Would something > like: > > # lucreate -c bootenv1 -m /:c2d0s0:ufs -n bootenv2 > > be sufficient ? That is, will Z2 in bootenv2 "see" /zfspool/users/home ? > > Any help is appreciated ! > > g.s > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > storage-discuss mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss > _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org