Steve Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tar is usually not the best archiving tool, as tends to deal poorly with > symbolic links. There are some examples of migrating a zone using both > ufs (via pax) and zfs (via zfs send/recieve).
Please elaborate what you like to point to when using the term "tar"? The Sun tar implementation has _security_ bugs related to archives that contain symbolic links but the same problem applies to the OpenGroup owned "pax" implementation currently found at /usr/bin/pax. "star" on the other side has no known issues related to symbolic links. What are you talking about? Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list email@example.com