/usr/bin/tar on solaris 10.
My comment was incorrect. I was referring to the preservation of hard links.
I need to investigate the status of this in the various verions of tar.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:59:10AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Steve Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > tar is usually not the best archiving tool, as tends to deal poorly with
> > symbolic links. There are some examples of migrating a zone using both
> > ufs (via pax) and zfs (via zfs send/recieve).
> Please elaborate what you like to point to when using the term "tar"?
> The Sun tar implementation has _security_ bugs related to archives that
> symbolic links but the same problem applies to the OpenGroup owned "pax"
> implementation currently found at /usr/bin/pax.
> "star" on the other side has no known issues related to symbolic links.
> What are you talking about?
> EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
> URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
zones-discuss mailing list