Sounds like it is definitely worth a JIRA - please do create one! Keeping the discussion together can focus it, and is much more likely to lead to patches :)
Henry 2010/1/15 Kay Kay <kaykay.uni...@gmail.com>: > Thanks Mahadev / Flavio for the pointers. > > There are definitely some practical scenarions that we feel would be useful > with this / that I should be able to put down over the w/e . > > Curious , does this warrant a jira to consolidate the discussion to keep in > one place ? I had been trying to gather bits and pieces from various sources > . > > > > On 1/15/10 1:17 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: >> >> Hi, Mahadev said it all, we have been thinking about it for a while, but >> haven't had time to work on it. I also don't think we have a jira open for >> it; at least I couldn't find one. But, we did put together some comments: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/PartitionedZookeeper >> >> One of the main issues we have observed there is that partitioning will >> force us to change our consistency guarantees, which is far from ideal. >> However, some users seem to be ok with it, but I'm not sure we have >> agreement. >> >> In any case, please feel free to contribute or simply express your >> interests so that we can take them into account. >> >> Thanks, >> -Flavio >> >> >> On Jan 15, 2010, at 12:49 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote: >> >>> Hi kay, >>> the namespace partitioning in zookeeper has been on a back burner for a >>> long time. There isnt any jira open on it. There had been some >>> discussions >>> on this but no real work. Flavio/Ben have had this on there minds for a >>> while but no real work/proposal is out yet. >>> >>> May I know is this something you are looking for in production? >>> >>> Thanks >>> mahadev >>> >>> >>> On 1/14/10 3:38 PM, "Kay Kay" <kaykay.uni...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Digging up some old tickets + search results - I am trying to understand >>>> what current state is , w.r.t support for namespace partitioning in >>>> zookeeper. Is it already in / any tickets-mailing lists to understand >>>> the current state. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > >
