On 14 Jul 2005, at 17:33, yuppie wrote:
I don't think we should try to maintain code compatibility on HEAD. All we should promise is that imports of old profiles work and that we don't break the persistent SetupTool.


I suppose right now we're all a little bit in the air about what CVS HEAD is going to become. Will it be CMF 2.0 or CMF 1.6? If we go the more radical way to 2.0 it would be more permissible to have lesss backwards compatibility I'd say...

jens

_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to