Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 15 Nov 2005, at 02:56, Rob Miller wrote:
to be fair, AT's (un)indexing code is a mess... i tried to change the
BaseFolderMixin manage_(after|before)* methods so they explicitly
call the PortalFolder implementations and was still ending up w/
subobject orphans left in the catalog after container deletions.
ideally, this would provide us an opportunity to push the
CatalogMultiplex functionality down into the CMF core and clean up
the indexing mess on the Plone side a bit. and in a perfect world,
we'd defer the actual (un)indexing until the end of the transaction.
those changes might be too much to try to get into CMF 1.6, however...
A big -1 on just pushing the Plone mess into CMF.
I don't think that was the plan.
As Raphael suggests, it would be much better to go directly to event-
based cataloging. However, that sounds like too big of a chunk for the
Indeed and that's why the transition phase allows to keep using
manage_afterAdd, provided a minimum level of cooperation from the
frameworks. The minimum level of cooperations is to use super() properly.
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests