Am 16.11.2008 um 16:17 schrieb yuppie:

> Questions: Is there a good reason why Plone doesn't register
> portal_setup as utility? Does the same reason apply to CMFDefault?  
> Do we
> have to support registered and not registered portal_setup tools?

Does this relate to the discussions (earlier this year? last year?) on  
which tools should be moved to utilities?

I fully support Jens' justification of the utility approach. Things  
are a bit weird at the moment with some things still being tools and  
others utilities but once I got used to the utility approach I found  
it saner.

I don't think that we can support both approaches and if Plone needs a  
wrapper around the utility with access to the request object then  
surely that is something for Plone?

Charlie Clark
Helmholtzstr. 20
D- 40215
Tel: +49-211-938-5360
GSM: +49-178-782-6226

Zope-CMF maillist  -

See for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to