Am 16.11.2008 um 16:17 schrieb yuppie:
> Questions: Is there a good reason why Plone doesn't register
> portal_setup as utility? Does the same reason apply to CMFDefault?
> Do we
> have to support registered and not registered portal_setup tools?
Does this relate to the discussions (earlier this year? last year?) on
which tools should be moved to utilities?
I fully support Jens' justification of the utility approach. Things
are a bit weird at the moment with some things still being tools and
others utilities but once I got used to the utility approach I found
I don't think that we can support both approaches and if Plone needs a
wrapper around the utility with access to the request object then
surely that is something for Plone?
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests