Am 24.09.2009, 14:09 Uhr, schrieb Jens Vagelpohl <[email protected]>:
> Renaming provides less than little perceived gain. It adds serious pain > because then you must go about registering your package manually, you > must change imports all over, and you force every package that depends > on the CMF to do the same. Besides, the different CMF packages are > standard Zope2 products. Leaving them in the Products namespace makes > that very clear. While I'm convinced of the little gain (and even more so of the extended pain), I think that the move to eggs will over time make the Zope Products idea redundant. I guess this is why Plone has dropped it. Anyway, I'm glad we had the discussion as it helped me understand better how things fit together. :-) Regarding something completely different - I picked up on zope-dev that the svn server has been updated. Does this mean that we can now use the svn branch to trunk merging offered in svn >= 1.5 or is this still inadvisable? If it is still inadvisable could you list (again) how to go about doing it properly and safely? Charlie -- Charlie Clark Helmholtzstr. 20 Düsseldorf D- 40215 Tel: +49-211-938-5360 GSM: +49-178-782-6226 _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
