Am 13.10.2010, 18:09 Uhr, schrieb Tres Seaver <>:

> I'm not sure what you are referring to.  The 'ursa' extension profile
> adds an 'ursa' skin which inserts the 'ursine' layer before the
> "standard" ones, exactly as 'absolut' does.  That layer has two purposes:
> - - Use the 'ursine_globals' view to generate top-level names .
> - - Provide *no* layout at all, beyond easy-to-manipulate semantic
>   markup for the menus and view content.

Sorry, it was the not wiring up the Ursa skin as default which threw me.

> This second case is the one which does not overlap with the 'absolut'
> skin, and is the reason I want to keep it:  any layout-oriented markup
> *at all* is just something which makes it harder to retheme a site under
> Deliverance.
>> If you do set it to
>> default you get errors from zpt_generic/index_html_template because
>> object_title and object_description are missing.
> I don't know what you mean here:  the site renders just fine for me with
> 'ursa' set ast the default skin.

I added the definitions to the main_template so that a default folder view  

> There is no 'Bare' skin in my trunk site at all.

This 'Bare' is in the description when selecting the extension profile:
"CMF 'Bare' skin  Provide skin w/ stripped-down main template."

> Can we please quit arguing about this, and leave the 'ursa' extension
> profile / 'ursine' layer in place?

I wasn't really arguing and I am leaving them alone!

Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark Consulting & Research
German Office
Helmholtzstr. 20
D- 40215
Tel: +49-211-600-3657
Mobile: +49-178-782-6226
Zope-CMF maillist  -

See for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to