Phillip J. Eby writes:
> So, I am thinking perhaps I should split ZPatterns into two products:
> PlugIns and DataSkins. The DataSkins product would require the PlugIns
> product. LoginManager would require both. For backward compatibility,
> there would need to be a "final release" of ZPatterns which contained stubs
> to load in classes from their new locations, so that existing objects
> stored in ZODB's would not be "broken". Newly created objects, of course,
> would refer to the new products automatically.
Sounds like it would reduce some of the apparent complexity of the
current ZPatterns. Not the final solution but it would help.
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
