Marc Lindahl wrote: > > Don't you have that now with the kludgey 'not' construct?
What is kludgey about the 'not:' construct?! cheers, Chris _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
