on 5/10/02 11:32 AM, Chris Withers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] scrivened: > Marc Lindahl wrote: >> >> Don't you have that now with the kludgey 'not' construct? > > What is kludgey about the 'not:' construct?!
For the reasons 'else' was invented in the first place, I guess: prone to errors, inefficient, bulky. The biggest thing I see is: isn't linked to the other construct, so it's prone to errors when editing the conditions. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
