On Monday 12 Aug 2002 11:31 pm, Romain Slootmaekers wrote: > But we found something else: > > I included a script below that produces a stripped down analogy > of our problem. (no zope needed, just ZODB, and you might wanna modify > the first line to get it working)
Ive read your sample, but not tried it. > The question is: is intended ZODB behaviour or not, and is there a work > around ? Yes, this is the intended behaviour. While excecuting the conflict resolution logic, your conflicting objects exist in a void - completely seperate from all other ZODB objects. Any attributes which you might expect to be other persistent objects are substituted for attribute-less placeholders. This is the 'PersistentReference' object in your traceback. Note that these attributes are only a 'PersistentReference' while processing the conflict resolution logic. If you access this attribute at any other time you get your normal class, with all its normal attributes. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
