I have always run Zope behind Apache utilising mod_proxy.
I have to admit I never tried or really even evaluated pcgi, and don't
build it when I install Zope.
Is there a benefit of pcgi over using mod_proxy ?
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 09:16, Jeff Rush wrote:
> Having only ever used Zope-behind-PCGI myself, if we drop it, what would
> be the prevailing approach for running Zope behind Apache? Has everyone
> switched to FastCGI (or Quixote's SCGI) but me?
> Be aware that there are Zope-specific patches (some of which I provided)
> in the version of PCGI that Zope ships with, so you can't refer everyone
> to the non-Zope version of PCGI available elsewhere on the web. The
> patches relate to error handling and meaningful reporting, not core
> Dieter Maurer wrote:
> > Jim Fulton wrote at 2003-2-13 11:30 -0500:
> > > I'm wondering how PCGI should be supported in Zope moving forward.
> > Do we still need it?
> > I would prefer to drop it (to reduce complexity).
> Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -