On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 02:47, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Chris McDonough wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, could you explain why it matters in this context
> > whether it's an extensionclass or not? Is it because there might be a
> > set of people using PersistentMapping objects for whom its important
> > that they be able to use extenionclass semantics against them? I'd just
> > never thought of using __of__ or inheritedAttribute or any of the other
> > EC-specific stuff on a PersistentMapping.
> <shrug> Who knows. I'd rather be safe. It's not that hard.
> In any case, we would have needed the fix to handle old pickles
Can you answer a question about the features we're allowed now? If we
don't use extensionclass, is it possible to persist instances of
new-style classes in ZODB now (ie. is persistent.Persistent really a
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -